Want good things to happen to you? Follow us on Facebook.

Watch Featured Movies

Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000: After enslavement & near extermination by an alien race in the year 3000, humanity begins to fight back.

  • Currently 2.94/5
(269 votes)
Ratings: IMDB: 2.4/10 Metascore: 9% RT: 3%
Released: May 10, 2000
Runtime: 118 mins
Genres: Action Sci-Fi
Countries: USA
Director: Roger Christian
Actors: Alan Legros Andrew Campbell Andy Bradshaw Barry Pepper Christian Tessier Earl Pastko Forest Whitaker Jason Cavalier Jim Meskimen John Travolta Kelly Preston Kim Coates Marie-Josee Croze Michael Byrne Michael MacRae Michel Perron Noël Burton Richard Tyson Robert Higden Russell Yuen Sabine Karsenti Sean Hewitt Shaun Austin-Olsen Tait Ruppert Tim Post

Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 Links

Streaming films is becoming more risky every day. We strongly urge our users to use a VPN to make themselves anonymous while streaming films and TV shows online. Using a VPN ensures that your ISP, the government and the NSA can’t spy on you or block any streams. They will not be able to see ANY of your online activity. Protect Your Privacy with a Free VPN
Version 1 9204 views Report Broken
  • Currently 5.00/5
(1 votes)
Version 2 44 views Report Broken
  • Currently 0.00/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(0 votes)
Version 3 938 views Report Broken
  • Currently 3.03/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(37 votes)
Version 4 1177 views Report Broken
  • Currently 5.00/5
(1 votes)
Version 5 6517 views Report Broken
  • Currently 5.00/5
(1 votes)
Version 6 692 views Report Broken
  • Currently 3.00/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(34 votes)
Version 7 891 views Report Broken
  • Currently 2.95/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(37 votes)
Version 8 723 views Report Broken
  • Currently 2.89/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(28 votes)
Version 9 188 views Report Broken
  • Currently 2.79/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(39 votes)
Version 10 44 views Report Broken
  • Currently 2.76/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(17 votes)
Version 11 12 views Report Broken
  • Currently 2.58/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(12 votes)
Version 12 48 views Report Broken
  • Currently 2.50/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(10 votes)
Version 13 59 views Report Broken
  • Currently 2.40/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(10 votes)
= Low Quality = Medium Quality = High Quality How do I watch these?

Sponsored Content

Similar to Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000

Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 Tags

Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 Comments

Posted by The_pirate_king 1 year, 11 months ago
+5 | +6 / -1

even though every single comment is negative, I love this movie, don't ask me why i just do.

Comment by shelaar is hidden because it exceeded your tolerance threshold. ( ? ) [ Show/Hide Comment ]
Posted by shelaar 3 years, 4 months ago
+4 | +5 / -1

OK... I have seen worse - much worse than this film. Yes, this is so cheesy it could be cut with a knife, the acting overdone (or nonexistent in some cases), no science in this world applied, a music score that is laughable and editing down right awful in many spots, however, for some reason I LIKE this movie. It's fun, there's the hope-springs-eternal for mankind thing going on, there's a very small (thank goodness) bit of romance, fighting against all odds and more. One of my favorite snapshot moments is in the film: neanderthal-type men flying in the cockpits of fighter jets! Where else are you going to see that? LOL As someone else said, if you go into it with no expectations (at all) you just might enjoy it. I did...but I'm not exactly sure why! Enjoy!

Posted by Terrordar 3 years, 4 months ago
+4 | +4 / -0

I've heard a lot of static concerning this movie, and while I can understand the criticism, I don't particularly agree with it. Sure it was pretty awkward and strange with some of the acting and the plot, but I don't think it was all that bad. It's not great, or even that good honestly, but it's not as bad as I've heard people say it is.

Posted by Blazarius 5 months ago
+3 | +3 / -0

I don't get the negative comments, I love this flic, and about to watch it again for the xx time, 😄

Posted by MrJeep4x4 3 years, 2 months ago
+3 | +6 / -3

I enjoyed the movie, wasn't that bad, give it a shot 8/10

Posted by carla98292 3 years, 10 months ago
+3 | +4 / -1

3/5 Not to bad of a B movie. Worth a 1X watch

Posted by Jarus457 4 years, 2 months ago
+3 | +3 / -0

Funnily enough this movie has been voted the worst of the century, but it's only bad if you expect anything from it. Watch it with no expectations, and you won't be disappointed. At least it reminds me of Andromeda.

Posted by Bobbert88 7 years, 2 months ago
+3 | +5 / -2

man we need a link that we all can watch!

Posted by Songshadow 8 months ago
+2 | +2 / -0

I liked this movie. Like a lot of movies these days it is age related. If you are over 30 yrs you might like it better.

Posted by bwes 9 months ago
+2 | +2 / -0

it was ok for a one time watch B movie.

Posted by MadameDivine 1 year, 10 months ago
+2 | +3 / -1

I thought this was an OK movie,something to watch if ya have nothing else to do. 3/5

Posted by Steppenwolf82 2 years, 6 months ago
+2 | +7 / -5

The amount of balls this film sucks is legendary, even in hell.

Posted by SmokeyyNYY 2 years, 10 months ago
+2 | +2 / -0

Ok I remember this being much worse when I watched it 10 years ago but yes it is still pretty bad but not the worst Sci-Fi flick ever created. My biggest pet peeve is how unintelligent the aliens are yet they have invented teleportation between planets. Like the aliens weren't smart enough to take all the gold already mined from the planet like umm from Fort Knox? All it would have taken was them to read a few books haha.

Posted by PHILLY1018 5 years, 5 months ago
+2 | +2 / -0

Movie was horrible!!

Posted by AngryGiant 5 years, 6 months ago
+2 | +2 / -0

I had read the book before I saw this, and am rather disappointed. The book is a lot better than people on here give it credit, mostly due to its author's ties to the Church of Scientology. If you take it as a Sci-fi story, it is decent, but the fact that the movie changes so much, not to mention only gets halfway through leaves me wanting something more. 5/10 for half the story.

Posted by ColdSteelRising 2 months ago
+1 | +1 / -0

totally a waste of time - this is science stupid, not science fiction. Who writes this garbage.

Posted by mussashi 5 months ago
+1 | +1 / -0

Love this movie!!

Posted by GREGGWRIGHT 1 year, 11 months ago
+1 | +2 / -1

An OK one time watch B movie, multiple comments below explain why Travolta lent his name to this and how it could have been a great trilogy ... 3/5

Posted by Canuckian 3 years, 8 months ago
+1 | +2 / -1

This movie was based on a best selling Sci-fi book written by none other then L.Ron Hubbard, the creator of Scientology, who, believe it or not, was a science fiction writer before he created Scientology and dianetics. Travolta is a huge Scientologist (like Tom Cruise) so i am not surprised to see him in one of the leading roles based on a book written by his "religious" leader. Some say he is over-acting his part, if you had read the book, you would know that the character Travolta is playing is exactly as Travolta portrayed him, Arrogant, greedy, manipulative, megalomaniacal tyrant who hates being there and believes wholly in his and his races superiority over Humans..i thought Travolta played him very well..as did Whittaker with his character. The book is unbelievable, so much is missing from this movie...if they really took this movie seriously, they would have taken the book and made a trilogy of movies out of it as it was a big book with alot of stuff going on, alot of characgter development, which was missing in this movie or you would understand Travoltas and Whittakers characers betters...this movie was a flop because they didnt take it seriously enough, it could have been excellent, up there with other great Sci-fi movies...I highly suggest reading the book, dont waste your time watching this until you have read the book at least, then you will understand.

Posted by JACKSISLAND 4 years, 9 months ago
+1 | +2 / -1

Some parts of this film just do not make sense ... its based 1000 years from now yet things like paper (a biodegradable substance) are still around.. a brutally bad film but for some reason I did not turn it off? 4/10

Post a Comment

Please login to make a comment

Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 Reviews



Remember Me
Forgot Login | Make a Free Account

Information

LetMeWatchThis Guide TV Schedule

Support the Site

Site Updates and News

Did you know you can use Primewire.org and Primewire.is to access this site? Well, now you do.
Check out the personalized TV Schedule.

Latest Comments

Man with a Plan

nakedheart : Freaking Hilarious .

The Accountant

liddlek : Well this is one hot mess. It actually seemed quite promising at first but t ...

Forbidden: Dying for Love

origamibird : OMG... this story is so sick.

Mary Kills People

thunderbolito : WTF!!!! they killed the dude from 19-2 , not cool lol lol!!, this is going to be ...

Doctor Strange

DreadPirateRobert : When he is speeding in the car at the start and the guy is giving him options fo ...

The Vessel

makingaripple : Yet another one of those "art" or "deep" meaningful movies t ...

American Pastoral

DreadPirateRobert : I like Ewan McGregor as an actor, but he'll never be thought of as a great as th ...

More Comments

Support the Site

Tell Us Stuff

Support the Site